Nationals Arm Race

"… the reason you win or lose is darn near always the same – pitching.” — Earl Weaver

Quick Reactions to Four Full Season Rosters

4 comments

Andrew Alvarez got the opening day start for AAA Rochester. Photo via Fred Nats

Today on April 1st, we got the three remaining full-season rosters for our affiliates. This is not an April Fools Prank 🙂

Here’s quick links to the data (though Luke Erickson has already done a great job of distilling the information for us at this post for AAA and this post for the other three).

Here’s the direct links to official Press Releases and/or other social media roster announcements:

The Nats Big Board is now up to date for all four rosters. I’ve slotted in all the players in the roles I think they’re set to take for now (will adjust this as we get real games to see who’s actually in what job), and moved all others to XST.

Here’s some random thoughts of each roster, from AAA to low-A

AAA

  • There’s not enough playing time to go around for our 40-man middle infielders. One from Baker, Nunez, and Lipscomb (all of whom are 2B/SS guys) has to sit. Opening day it was surprisingly Baker not starting.
  • They only really have 3 true outfielders on this roster: their bench bats/DH types are 1B only (Yepez, Cordero) or backup middle infield (Cluff) thanks to the team keeping a 3rd catcher.
  • They’re carrying a 3rd catcher in Lindsly, and Knizner declined his option to leave and now is the backup in AAA. Interesting. Maybe he’s actually the starter in AAA since he was kept in MLB camp longer than Millas. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
  • Paul Witt was a catcher, then an outfielder, now he’s being called a 3B. What’s more amazing is that he’s made it to AAA despite a career .210 batting average as a NDFA from the Covid 2020 year.
  • With the team finally acknowledging that Adon and Rutledge can’t start, the rotation was pretty easy to figure out. Alvarez, Lara, Ogasawara got the first three slots, and (we’ll find out the rest soon) but the other two starters kind of have to be Choi and Solesky. They already threw Plinkington and Adon in middle relief … so perhaps that was their “throw day” and they’ll start later this week, but we’ll see. Likely starter Stuart starts on the DL, otherwise rule-5 pick Choi may be in AA.
  • I like Solesky pushed to AAA. I was worried about exposing him to Rule5, perhaps a dumb take, but now he’s got an opportunity to shine in Rochester.
  • It’s go-time for back-end relievers Sinclair and Romero; if they can continue to light it up while MLB’ers falter, they’ll get promoted in no time.

AA

  • As it turned out, the team kept Wallace in AA, meaning there’s no 3B push for playing time split in AAA with House.
  • (Yes, I know some of you readers think that’s dumb, that House hasn’t proved he’s the man yet, etc etc, just trying to think like a Nats player development executive who gave House $5M of the team’s money three years ago).
  • AA seems to have four guys who all play basically the same position now: Wallace, Glasser, Lawson, and Arruda. All four seem to be the kinds of players who played SS in the past but who now are better suited to be 2B/3B types. I wonder how the playing time will shake out. Does the team keep Wallace at 3B, or do they have him start to work on 2B with the assumption that 3B is blocked?
  • Maxwell Romero now starting Catcher in AA. I may have to push him up my prospect rankings.
  • The AA roster shows that we have somewhat of a “gap” in our player dev pipeline. No fewer than 8 of the 28 rostered players in AA are MLFA signings from last off-season or the one before. That’s a lot.
  • Where is Kevin Made? Is he hurt?
  • Just one 40-man guy in AA: the converting to relief Cole Henry. I would imagine he’ll move up to AAA as soon as he shows he’s got it.
  • The rotation in AA should be: Shuman, Luckham, Saenz, Susana, Atencio. It’ll certainly be interesting to see how Susana holds up here. He did not look good in the breakout game. Saenz and Luckham probably have the most to prove.
  • Knowles on the 60-day to start, otherwise he’d be in the SP mix. Cuevas lost his rotation spot last year and could replace a faltering guy. We’ll see.

High-A

  • Three of our more important prospects start in High-A: 2024 1st rounder King, 1st-Supp Lomavita, and 4th rounder Kent (who makes his pro debut).
  • Wilmington’s lineup is YOUNG. 5 of the 9 guys who I think start opening day are 20 or 21 in High-A. Cruz, King, Green, Cox, and White. Wow; all five of those guys have single-syllable names like me. 🙂
  • Both Green and Cox get “socially promoted” like the Football coach’s idiot son.
  • White set to repeat Low-A for the third time.
  • Both the above sentences exhibits #1 and #1A why drafting HS players is risky.
  • I wonder if LSU-product Gavin Dugas could be a player. I was listening to the new Nats podcast with Dan Kolko and Ryan Zimmerman called 11th inning (it’s actually quite good) and Zimmerman was talking about the his opinion of Dylan Crews from spring training. He talked about how Crews carries himself like a 10year veteran when it comes to preparation and training … making the comment that the LSU program does a great job preparing these guys. Dugas was a monster in college, a guy who stayed til he was a senior and provided a ton of leadership. Would love to see him make it as a hard-contact 2B.
  • The rotation looks like it’ll be Clemmey, Tepper, Davis, Sthele, and 2024 draftee Kent. Cornelio may have run out of rope with his 5.51 ERA last year.
  • We’re missing a couple of big names though who should be in this rotation instead: Bennett and Sykora. Bennett coming off of TJ, Sykora coming off some minor off-season surgery, so both are in XST for a bit. They probably would have replaced Sthele and Tepper.
  • The bullpen is a motley collection of NDFAs, 8-9th rounders, MLFAs and Rule5 guys.

Low-A

  • As expected, Lomavita starting Catcher at one A-ball roster and Bazzell at the other. We’ll see who wins the race going forward. If Bazzell is as good as Keith Law Thinks, we’ll know soon enough.
  • Former decent prospect Quintana demoted from High-A to F-burg to presumably DH.
  • Name to keep an eye on: Carlos Tavares. 2023IFA signing for only $10k, one of the few to even make it to FCL for 2024, where he had an OPS of .869 last year and now is in Low-A as a 19yr old who doesn’t turn 20 til the season is over. Listed as an OF but played mostly 1B last year.
  • 2024 draftee Diaz will slate into the starting lineup here and comprise part of the left side of Fredericksburg’s infield presumably. Diaz getting some prospect buzz.
  • 2024 9th rounder Jackson Ross, a 5th year senior who got just $2k, breaks camp with the Low-A team. Bravo.
  • Big Money signing Vaquero back here, repeating Low-A, seeing if he can improve on .190. Hey, get enough of a signing bonus (ahem Green) and you’ll get promoted eventually.
  • Just like in 2024, the team seems to use Fredericksburg’s 60-day DL as its dumping grounds for injured minor league arms. There’s already 3 guys on there to start 2025 (Sullivan, Agostini, and Camilio Sanchez).
  • The rotation should be Roman, Polanco, Tolman (coming off 60-day dl last year), 2024 6th rounder Davian Garcia, and 2024 7th rounder Robert Cranz. Cranz appeared on both BA and Law’s top 30 list.
  • Most of the bullpen are 2024 middle round draftees, and there’s still a handful more in XST who have yet to get assigned anywhere.
  • There’s not too many players still sitting in FCL who i thought should be in Low-A honestly. The most notable/high profile player there right now is Luke Dickerson, who wasn’t goign to be starting at SS in Low-A anywya.
  • Notables missing from the Low-A roster who were there last year: Rafael Ramirez Jr (we got him in the Lane Thomas trade), Brayan Romero (the random guy who popped up on the BA top 30 list earlier this year), Sykora as discussed before, Starter Pablo Aldonis (who was on the 60-day dl last year), and a slew of middle relievers and bench players who likely are going to comprise the majority of the cuts we’ll start to see as the team starts to add DSL guys to FCL rosters and/or adds the 2025 draft class.

On the Big board, i’m leaving FCL for now, though technically FCL=XST. I went ahead and moved all the 2025IFAs to DSL just to stick them there; DSL now has 42 players on it, which is a ton and we’ll see some churn (promotions to FCL and releases).

thoughts?

Written by Todd Boss

April 1st, 2025 at 2:35 pm

Opening Day Starter Trivia for 2025 plus Observations on the state of Starting Pitching

4 comments

Richmond Native Verlander remains the career leader of Opening day starts. Photo unk via rumorsandrants.com

Now that the 2025 Opening Day is past us, and I’ve updated the XLS for this year’s starters and done some housecleaning of now-retired starters, here’s some Opening day starter trivia for you.

Here’s a link to the Opening day starter xls, which is also updated along the right hand side in the Links section. It is also worth noting that Baseball Reference of course maintains similar information. Here for example is the canonical opening day list of lineups (pitchers and players) for the Washington Nationals franchise. And here’s the list of all 30 teams’ opening day lineups for the 2025 season, with similar data for all past seasons). I can’t quite find a similar resource to just the starters across all 30 teams, but I’m sure it’s there somewhere, so I continue to maintain this XLS.

Ok, that being said, here’s some useless trivia related to Opening Day Starters:

  • First time Opening Day Starters for 2025: 12 of the 30, including our own MacKenzie Gore. It may be fair to say that, were there not an opening series in Japan, and were there not a couple of last minute scratches, this number should have been a lot lower, like maybe 8-9.
  • Current active Leader of Opening Day Starts: still Justin Verlander, with 12. He did 9 in Detroit, then another 3 in Houston. Others in the conversation are Kershaw (9), and Scherzer (7), neither of which seems likely to extend this record before they’re out of the game.
  • Current Active Consecutive streak: Logan Webb and Framber Valdez both now have 4 consecutive Opening day starts for San Francisco and Houston respectively.
  • Current Leader of Consecutive Opening Day Starts: both Verlander and Kershaw at one point made 7 straight opening day starts for their teams, and are the current leaders in that category. We’ll need another four years of consistency from Webb/Valdez to catch them, which seems unlikely (see my commentary below).

Historical records:

  • Most Opening Day Starts in History: Tom Seaver (16).  Tied for 2nd place with 14 is Jack Morris, Randy Johnson, Steve Carlton, Walter Johnson
  • Most Consecutive Opening Day Starts in History: Jack Morris; all 14 of his starts were in a row, Mr. Durability, and Mr. Hall of Famer thanks to the Veteran’s committee.

Nats Records:

  • Max Scherzer is the Nats franchise leader in Opening day starts with 6.
  • Strasburg is 2nd with four: he took the ball opening day in the 3 seasons before the Scherzer acquisition, then got it in 2017 mid Scherzer contract.
  • Gore with his 2025 start becomes just the 9th guy to get the ball opening day for Washington.
  • Odalis Perez remains the most unlikely Opening Day starter, getting the ball in our bottoming-out year of 2008.

Lastly, here’s some interesting team observations for 2025’s Opening day Starters

  • With Eovaldi getting the ball for the 2nd year in a row, Texas breaks a streak of having 8 different opening day starters in the 8 years prior to 2025. And it’s even crazier than that: They’ve had 15 different opening day starters in the last 16 seasons, dating to 2009! Only one guy has repeated: Cole Hamels in 2016 and 2018, and Now Eovaldi in 2024 and 2025.
  • Los Angeles Dodgers, despite being probably the league’s best team over the past decade or so and your defending WS champs, now has had 7 different guys make their last 7 opening day starts. Yamamoto, Glasnow, Urias, Buehler, Kershaw, May, and Ryu.
  • Urias, in case you didn’t remember, just was suspended a Half a Season for his SECOND domestic Violence arrest and has probably thrown his last MLB pitch. So, a 2nd DV arrest, charge, and pleading guilty = half a season suspension according to MLB. Meanwhile, Trevor Bauer, when he was accused of his first DV issue (but not charged, arrested, or guilty) was suspended for two full seasons and now cannot get a job in the Majors at a time when teams are begging for starters and is seemingly blacklisted by all 30 teams. Yes, Bauer comes across as opinionated and abrasive, but he was definitively cleared of charges AND pretty clearly demonstrated that his accusations were a complete setup by someone trying to catfish a major leaguer and who was subsequently indicted on felony fraud charges for filing false reports against Bauer … yet here we are. He’s missed out on literally hundreds of millions of dollars of salary because … why? Because he’s outspoken on Twitter?
  • Other teams who have not really been able to find a consistent starter: NY Mets: 5 straight different opening day starters. Cincinnati: 10 different starters in the last 11 years. Pittsburgh: 9 different starters in last 10. Baltimore: 9 different starters in the last 10 years. Angels: 9 in the last 11. Some teams just can’t find Aces.

Now for some random commentary on the state of Starting Pitching in the game. I write answers on Quora about Baseball all the time, and came across a question there asking whether recently inducted starters like CC Sabathia were “worthy” of the Hall b/c he “only” had 251 career wins. This in the context of the three aging star starters Verlander, Scherzer, and Kershaw who currently lead all active starters in Wins with (as of this writing on 3/28/25) 262, 216, and 212 respectively. They’re 42,40, and 37 respectively, meaning that the odds of them significantly adding to their current win totals seem slim.

But, I don’t think anyone would dispute that all three are no-doubt hall of famers, despite two of them not being close to even 250 wins, let alone 300 wins. Three major individual awards basically make a player a lock for the hall:

  • Verlander: 3 Cy Youngs (9 seasons in the top 5), 1 MVP, 1 Rookie of the Year, 3400+ Ks
  • Scherzer: 3 Cy Youngs (8 seasons in top 5), 3400+ Ks.
  • Kershaw: 3 Cy Youngs (7 seasons in top 5), 1 MVP, and has 2968 Ks as we speak.

But….. what’s next? A quick perusal at the state of Starting Pitching in the league reveals that we may not see another 250 win pitcher…. ever? Here’s the rest of the current active top 10 of career Wins leaders with their ages and some context:

  • Gerrit Cole: 153 wins at age 34; just blew out elbow so he’s missing all of 2025. Does he even get to 200 career wins now?
  • Charlie Morton: 138 wins at age 41: he’s the #2 guy in Baltimore’s rotation but this may be his last season.
  • Chris Sale: 138 wins at age 36; having a second-wind career moment, coming off of last year’s Cy Young, but he made just 11 starts in 2020, 2021, and 2022 combined thanks to injury. Does he get to 175 career wins?
  • Kyle Gibson: 112 wins at age 37. Quick: what team does Kyle Gibson pitch for? I had to look it up; he signed with Baltimore a week ago and just got optioned to AAA. He’s 7th in the majors in career wins! And now he’s going to pitch in Norfolk for a bit.
  • Sonny Grey: 111 wins at age 35. Ok, so he’s St. Louis’ #1 starter and has been relatively durable, but can you count on him getting even to 150 career wins? He has 36 wins in his last four seasons combined.
  • Carlos Carrasco: 110 wins at age 38. He signed a MLFA/NRI deal with the Yankees and seems to have lucked his way into a rotation spot. In his last two combined seasons, he’s had a 6.00 ERA and a -2.6 bWAR, and it doesn’t seem like he’s long for the majors at this point.
  • Yu Darvish; also 110 wins at age 38. He’s still under contract for 3 more years in San Diego, which may give him a shot at 150 career wins.

Where’s the sure-fire Hall of Fame starting pitcher with 250 wins and 3,000 Ks in this group?? Nowhere to be found. Would you even characterize the two best guys on this list (Cole and Sale) as hall of famers right now? I wouldn’t. Maybe Cole if he comes back and dominates, but that’s no sure thing.

Lets look a bit further down the list of active starting pitcher win leaders to see who looks like they’re putting together a career that, maybe possibly could turn into a HoFame career?

  • The two best Age/Accumulated wins combos might be Aaron Nola (104 wins at age 32) and Jose Berrios (99 wins at age 31).
  • Nola had one great 9.7 bWAR season in 2018, while Barrios has received Cy Young votes in exactly one season in his career (a 9th place finish, meaning he probably got like one home-town writer vote, in 2021).
  • The highest career win total for a player who hasn’t turned 30 yet is Dylan Cease, who has 57 wins at age 29.
  • the 50-career win range has a slew of other guys who are “known names,” guys like Logan Webb, Zac Gallen, Jack Flaherty, etc.
  • Our former #1 draft pick Lucas Giolito? 61 wins at age 30, right in this same range.

I mean, do any of these guys sound like Hall of Famers to you?

What’s my point? Randy Johnson was elected to the hall in 2015, finishing off a 300-win career in 2010. That was a decade ago, but it might as well be a lifetime ago in terms of evolution of pitching in the game. Not only does it not look like we’ll see a 300 win pitcher ever again, after Justin Verlander I’m sure we’ll ever see a 250 game winner again. And, I’ll just go ahead and say it; after Scherzer and Kershaw i’m not sure we’ll ever see a 200 game winner again. Nobody except Gerrit Cole is projecting to be even close to 200 wins for his career.

A Decade from now, will the new standards for SPs in Cooperstown really be 175 wins and 2,500 Ks?

Written by Todd Boss

March 31st, 2025 at 8:35 am

Nats Opener History and Trivia updated for 2025

13 comments

Sorry MacKenzie, you can’t win ’em all! Photo wikipedia

Welcome to the 2025 Baseball Season!

Well, it isn’t every day you get a 6ip, 1hit, 0run, 13K, 0BB effort from a starter and lose, but that’s what the Nats managed to do yesterday in their home and season opener against the hated Phillies. MacKenzie Gore certainly carved through the Phillies lineup, each of whom struck out at least once on the day (Philadelphia made 19 of their 30 outs via the whiff).

As I mentioned in the comments, It’s rather ironic that both of the Philly homers on the day came from ex-Nats (Harper and Schwarber). I wish them well.


One random little artifact I maintain for some reason is a collection of our Opening Day and Home Opener data, like attendance, box scores, W/L, etc. Here’s that information for review with some trivia sprinkled in.

Home Opener Attendance and Weather through the years

2025’s attendance was up from previous years, a good sign for the team as it tries to convince the town that it may be close to competing again. We’re still well below the debut years of the stadium (I think they’ve removed a bunch of seats since the stadium opened in 2008 so the capacity will never be back in the 45k range), and the home opener record will likely always be the 2005 debut game of the franchise in DC, 45,596 at the old RFK, as people fought past protestors and secret service to often get into the game in the middle of the 2nd inning. (Note; the record for the franchise is record for the stadium still remains 2012 NLDS Game 5, or the “Storen” game, of 45,966).

Best and Worst weather for a home opener? Yesterday was 57 and sunny; that’s pretty good. I’d probably say the best weather for a home opener remains the “Phillies Invasion” game back in 2010, though we’ve had a slew of mid-70s and sunny openers in our history. The worst weather for a home opener? probably the 2011 41-degree afternoon game, though it must have been brutal to sit through the 2022 opener 4+ hour delay). Reminder from 2020: the 90-degree day was b/c the season was delayed into the summer.

  • 2025: 41,231 (4:05 thurs game, 57, sunny, slight wind)
  • 2024: 40,405 (4:05 tues game, 53, cloudy, slight wind)
  • 2023: 35,756 (105 thurs game, 45 degrees and sunny)
  • 2022: 35,052 (7:05 thurs game (pushed back from 4:05, then delayed to 8:21 weather. 52 degrees, cloudy, rainy)
  • 2021: 4,801 (4:05 tuesday game, 74 degrees, partly cloudy, 5mph wind)
  • 2020: 0 (7:09 thurs game, 90, partly cloudy, 7mph wind)
  • 2019: 42,263 (1:07 thurs game, 56, partly cloudy, no wind)
  • 2018: 42,477 (1:08 thurs game, 42, partly cloudy, slight wind)
  • 2017: 42,744 (1:05 monday game, 66 and cloudy, slight wind)
  • 2016: 41,650 (4:05 thursday game, 60 and 1.5hr rain delay)
  • 2015: 42,295 (4:05 monday game, 75 and gorgeous)
  • 2014: 42,834 (1:05 friday game, 50s and overcast)
  • 2013: 45,274 (1:05 monday game, 60 and beautiful)
  • 2012: 40,907 (1:05 thursday game 56, partly cloudy)
  • 2011: 39,055 (1:05 thursday game, 41 degrees and overcast)
  • 2010: 41,290 (1pm game monday, beautiful weather 80s and sunny): This was Phillies Invasaion
  • 2009: 40,386 (3pm game on a monday, chilly 53degr and overcast).
  • 2008: 39,389 (season and stadium opener), 8pm sunday night, Braves, nat’l tv clear but cold.
  • 2007: 40,389 (in rfk, 1pm game vs Florida, 72 degrees
  • 2006: 40,516 (in rfk, tuesday day game vs Mets, 72 degr and sunny)
  • 2005: 45,596 (in rfk, debut of entire franchise, 62 degr and clear, evening game).

Home opener Results and Box Scores

The Nats are just 6-15 all time through 2025 in their home openers, a pretty interesting stat given that for most of the 2010s they were one of the best teams in the sport. We nearly always play a divisional rival in our home opener: of our 21 home openers, just 4 have come against non-divisional rivals (including the weird 2020 Covid year and our franchise opener, which was delayed after a huge road trip to start the season to allow the stadium add’l prep time).


Nats Season Openers.
We are slightly better in Season openers: Record: 8-13. We’ve been home 13 times, away 8 times.

Written by Todd Boss

March 28th, 2025 at 9:30 am

Posted in Nats in General

Six Weeks into Div1 Season Check-In on 1-1 Candidates

21 comments

Liam Doyle can sure strike them out; but is it Nuke Laloosh style? Photo via his X

Here’s our third check-in on the 1-1 candidates, focusing on the College players now that they’re six weeks (aka six weekend series) into their seasons. We’re into the conference schedules, so no more patty cakes for these guys, and we should start to see some better indication of how good these guys are.

Aggregation Stats for all of College

Link Block for the top guys under 1-1 consideration

College guys we’re removing from 1-1 discussion for now:

Prep Players who are theoretically in the running: I’ll only include them if I come across some new/live reporting.


Here’s some commentary:

  • LaViolette: Jace has had a couple solid weeks, raising his average from the low .200s to a more solid looking .284, part of his current .284/.434/.568 slash line. His TAMU team is falling off a cliff, getting swept in their first two SEC series, but he looked decent at Vanderbilt last weekend, going a combined 4-10 with a homer and 3 walks. He needs to get hot to get himself back in 1-1 discussions.
  • Arnold: Continued his hot start with a scoreless (albeit short) outing against Boston College two weekends ago, then got shelled at Miami in his first real test of the season, giving up 7ER in 4IP. Unfortunately, Mike Rizzo was in Miami for the start, and probably didn’t like what he saw. Curiously, he’s yet to get to 80 pitches in any start this year. Is that b/c its been cold (in Tallahasse??), he’s still getting stretched out (he’s got 6 starts now?) or because his team didn’t “need” him to go deeper than 75 pitches/5 innings? Some question marks here.
  • Bremner: cruised past the weaker Miami 6ip/1ER, then gave up 3ER in the 5th against the tougher UC Irvine to take a loss despite a quality start. His team mustered just 4 hits on the day. His season numbers look “okay” but not fantastic, and I can’t see getting excited to take this guy 1-1.
  • Arquette: his average took a nose dive in the past couple of weeks as GCU/Santa Clara held him to just a 2-13 line, then Cal Poly “held” him to a 2-10 weekend (both hits were homers). He’s still slashing above 1,000.
  • Doyle continues to have circus numbers on the season, maintaining his 18 K/9 rate. But now the hard part; SEC play. It took him 105 pitches to go 4 2/3 against Florida two weeks ago (phew) but he only had two walks. Sounds like a lot of full counts. Then he got hit against Alabama, giving up 6 in 6 to take two straight losses as Tennessee’s ace (110 pitches to finish 6 innings). I wonder; are scouts already thinking reliever here? 100 pitches to get through 5 innings in college would probably be 3 innings in the pros.
  • Kilen suffered a Hamstring injury that has had him sitting since 3/18/25. He’s slashing .431/.552/.986 for a ridiculous 1,538 OPS figure for the season, but he’s now set to miss SEC play. They’re hopeful he’s back for next weekend.
  • Taylor sports a healthy 1,200 OPS right now. His problem will be competition: Indiana doesn’t exactly play a powerhouse schedule. They did have to visit UCLA last weekend, and he went 3-11 with a homer. But, hitting .370 against Ohio State and Penn State isn’t that impressive. Furthermore, a ton of his stats are built on mid-week games against a college called “The Mount,” who i’ve never heard of but who Indian beat 18-5 and 20-7 in two mid-week games. I may drop covering him unless he does something against a solid opponent.
  • Summerhill maintains a .400 BA 6 weeks into the season against what admittedly looks like one of the tougher pre-conference schedules I’ve seen. He profiles as a rangy OF, maybe CF, playing RF and batting leadoff for Arizona. He has some power. We’ll see how he holds on as AZ enters deeper into its Big12 schedule.

The Race for 1-1: Arnold takes a step back, Bremner looks meh, Arquette comes back to reality, Doyle can’t find the plate, and LaViolette takes a step back in the right direction but is it too little, too late? And, does this college churn pave the way for Holliday to return to 1-1 status?

Written by Todd Boss

March 24th, 2025 at 10:45 am

Posted in Draft,Prospects

Housekeeping Post – Link cleanup and Resource review

one comment

I do a lot of spreadsheet work when it comes to tracking Baseball stuff that I like to track. Some of those have turned into relatively well-known resources, while others are things I generally edit privately and post to Google Sheets sporadically.

First, some Housekeeping.

Frequent commenter Will pointed this out, and also pointed out that the links on the front page of NationalsArmRace.com were well out of date. What’s ironic is, I almost never go to the non-WordPress dashboard version of this page, so I hadn’t really looked at the mess of content that was along the right-hand side. In like 10 years. Most of the links there were for long-dead blogs, or spreadsheets I did in like 2015 or 2016. So, I cleaned them up drastically. I also got rid of several useless sections (the tag cloud) and now the right-side set of links is much more streamlined with content that’s actually up-to-date.


Next, now that I’ve cleaned up the Link section called “NatArmRace Creations,” here’s a review of those links and some discussion/insight into them. I’ve got these sections organized in the order these links appear along the right-hand side.

If any of these links don’t work, please let me know. They should all be set to be viewable for those with the link.


a All Nats Links I use

Direct Link: Nats Links: or https://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?page_id=16709

What is it? ALL the Nats/Baseball related links I’ve ever collected and/or use frequently. This is essentially my browser bookmark set for baseball and the Nats.

History/fun facts: I got tired of trying to use bookmarks to go to the pages I visit frequently, so initially this was a private HTML page, but eventually I migrated it to be a WordPress “page” within the nationalsarmrace.com blog site.

The links in the top few sections are mostly what I visit on a daily/weekly basis; for each of our minor league affiliates I have direct links to the Local paper for gamers (if one exists that covers the team), the milb.com home page, the roster, the stats, schedule, standings, and transactions.

If you scroll down you’ll see some out of date links for the Nats, and then you’ll see entire sections devoted to thinks like PEDs, Hall of Fame, stats, etc. I’ve recently put online all the CBA pdfs I have to have them all in one place, and all those links are on there.


Minor League System Org Rankings

Direct Link: Minor League System Rankings or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ipxQoHgXrf0EDL0iMc2zqLu4rX7RbXani4nfY0RUJlw/edit?usp=sharing

What is it? This is a list of all the Minor League system rankings i’ve found over the years from various pundits. There are more than 175 at this point dating back to 2000 and with links to older Baseball America rankings from there. There are divider lines that denote breaks in the rankings. Yellow shaded ranks are outliers that seem to not comply with the general consensus.

History: this is an XLS i’ve maintained since the late 2000s as I started to get into tracking prospects for the team. I used to actually keep a narrative of why each teams’ ranking rose or fell, but that proved to be too difficult to maintain (its still at the far right side dating back to 2010).


2025 MLB Draft Order

Direct Link: 2025 MLB Draft Order or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eOam8iWCo-n3BC9baIU06c7aBxvV9oKqANl7WDqUsys/edit?usp=sharing

What is it?. this is a working XLS that tracks the changes in the draft order as players with Qualifying Offers sign. Published/finalized with last QO-assigned signee once the last order-impacting event occurs.

History: I couldn’t find a resource elsewhere on the internet that kept the data in the way that I wanted to see it, which was driven initially by a desire to see what kind of draft picks teams were giving up when they signed QO-affiliated FAs. Other draft tracking sites (like MLB) just remove the picks as they’re lost without great detail as to what happened. I keep the team in place and adjust the number so you can see how many picks have been added or forfeited.


MLB Qualifying Offer Disposition

Direct Link: Qualifying Offer Worksheet or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1f9oJDRmCD0rH7zVj5FlcJ65YvPiuVvpFz3dkyUhHuaI/edit?usp=sharing

What is it? Every single QO player since the system was created is tracked in this XLS, with their new contract, draft picks given up, and a judgement whether the QO “screwed” the player or not.

History: when the QO system first was devised, I was fascinated to see if players were “screwing themselves” by taking a QO. So this spreadsheet was a way to kind of judge that, and to judge the effectiveness of the system.

Opinion: I can’t stand QOs. They are the epitome of a Union negotiating a “benefit” that impacts a tiny fraction of its member base instead of addressing larger concerns. Each year around 12-14 players get offered one and accept it. That’s around 1% of the union at any given time. Half those QOs offered are from teams who have no intention of re-signing the player; they’re just gambits to net an extra draft pick from a player already heading out the door. Plus, each year a chunk of the players just re-sign and it becomes moot. It also seems that every year one or two guys really mis-read the market and end up getting screwed by the QO. This past off-season, that screwed player was clearly Nick Pivetta, who took a 4yr/$55M deal and a huge decline in AAV.

The player who probably got the MOST screwed in the history of the QO system? It was either Mike Moustakas in 2017 or more likely our own Ian Desmond in 2015, who turned down a $100M contract from the Nats to play the market, found zero buyers, and ended up taking a 1 year $8M deal in which he moved to left field.


The Big Board

Direct Link: The Big Board or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/186nm-v5F-zTCoR2Be7TFYM3e2cZ-gYi2WVqJLEkHdmc/edit?usp=sharing

What is it? Updated rosters for every Nats major and minor league franchise, from the MLB all the way to the DSL. Each year has two tabs: one for the Rosters, one for the Releases.

History/fun facts: This document was the initial brainchild of an O.G. Natmosphere staple in Brian Oliver, who maintained the old Nationals Farm Authority site. From there, another big-time Nats fan named “SpringfieldFan” took over the XLS updating for a long time (the current online XLS dates from 2010, so we’ve lost the first few years of Oliver’s ownership). In Dec 2019 they transferred control to myself, and i’ve been updating it ever since.

Updates I’ve made since I took over:

  • I’ve added milb.com/baseball-reference.com links for every player.
  • I have added color coding for in-season promotions/demotions.
  • I’ve added in current age columns for all players
  • I added the XST section for players who seemed to be missing but not released but not assigned to a team.
  • I add URLs documenting releases if I can.
  • I try to keep the actual starters in the main positions they’re holding per team.
  • I try to keep the rotations accurate, and in the synced order with the big team across the system.
  • I mostly keep the bullpen roles accurate, especially in the upper levels, but in the lower levels it’s fluid.
  • This year I just added a running count of the entire system, given MLB’s new 165-person limit.

On a daily/weekly basis I’m updating transactions (DL trips, promotions, demotions, releases, MLFA signings, etc), confirming the rotation order in each level, and adjusting the starters. To do this, I’m completely indebted to Luke Erickson and his daily work at NationalsProspects.com basically summarizing the same. If/when Luke decides to hang it up on this daily work, I’m not sure I’ll have the time to do it myself, but for now, Luke seems game to keep going.


The Nats Draft Tracker

Direct Link: Draft Tracker or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Qd5DS9GlmkQOEh_zGhOvlhHK0EegqY1uJB4mLGmRBaY/edit?usp=sharing

What is it? A spreadsheet that has every single Nats draft pick since the team moved to DC in 2005, along with key information such as position, draft round, overall draft pick, their school, initial assignment, when they become Rule-5 eligible, and their bonus amount.

History/fun facts: I’m not sure who the original author was of this resource, but I do know that Erickson owned it for a time, as did SpringfieldFan. I’m also not sure exactly when I took over updating the data, but it was probably Dec 2019 as well.

Updates I’ve made since I took over:

  • Added in milb.com links for every player
  • Changed the color coding for readability; green means active in Nats system, blue means released from Nats sytem, etc.
  • Did a ton of googling about players we drafted but who didn’t sign to put in the correct disposition from older drafts. This is easier for more recent drafts, but harder for older players.
  • Began adding two draft artifacts I maintain every year: a Draft Signing worksheet with twitter links for the players, notes, and NDFAs. Plus I maintain a “Local Drafted Player worksheet” with every player drafted who has DC/MD/VA ties. These are all now in the Draft Tracker.

I’m not updating this on a daily basis, but do periodically go through and update for player releases, Rule-5 status in a class, etc. On a yearly basis i’m adding the new class details plus the two worksheets mentioned. And once in a blue moon i’ll google unsigned players from prior classes to see where they are and update the roster. I recently abandoned the “level” as impossible to maintain accurately and just turned it into “roster status” to track release dates for players.


Nats IFA Tracker

Direct Link: IFA Tracker or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksPorXhEHhtkNAGqxrJWqUFkvioMgoWhBU50uaZstc8/edit?usp=sharing

What is it? This is an emulation of the Draft Tracker, only for the International Free Agent classes. There’s a set of columns for each “class,” that includes Name, DOB, age at signing, position, country of origin, initial assignment (which is almost always the DSL), Rule5 eligibility date, and known signing bonus.

History/fun facts: I created this with the Jan 2023 class, then have been building it backwards one year at a time. I have it back to 2015 right now, but probably could continue to build it backwards by digging through draft class announcements and our big board releases over the years. However, much past the 2015 IFA class all it would be would be a cut-n-paste job of dozens of kids who got released before they turned 20, and the value doesn’t seem to be there.

The bonus pools are quite sketchy in the international market, but I’m pretty close to having the entire pool accounted for in the last few seasons. Well, not 2023, where i’m off more than $100k. I have no idea how bonus dollars work; can a team sign whoever it wants if the dollars are under a certain amount? Kind of like how you can sign NDFAs to your heart’s content for domestic players? Or does it all count towards the yearly dollar amount?

The IFA tracker also shows that we sign a slew of players each year and don’t announce the bonus amount, which I can only assume means its a nominal amount (like $2k or $5k). Also, we announce a “class” on January 15th each year (what used to be July 2nd until they pivoted the date thanks to Covid), but then they continue to sign IFAs throughout the year. If a player signs in a given year, I still call them part of that draft class.

MLB cancelled the July 2nd signing date in 2020 for Covid, hence no 2020 class, but they still managed to sign a couple guys in late 2020, who are now listed in that year’s class.

Should I build this backwards until we get closer to the “dark days” of Smiley Gonzalez and Jim Bowden? Maybe.



Nationals Prospect Ranks

Direct Link: Nationals Prospect Rankings or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dtx_W2CN19W2EyRyQ17iaSkoyc51u1qR/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102402795225850924380&rtpof=true&sd=true

What is it? This is a canonical list of EVERY prospect ranking i’ve ever found for the Nats farm system, from the most recently announced (Fangraphs in early June), back to Baseball America in 2004. More than 260 lists, with direct links whenever I could provide it. This sheet also has some cool information per player: their position, the year by year starting level (with red shading that indicates they’re repeating a level), their signing bonus, acquisition method and their signing/draft year. I’ve recently added their milb.com links and an active flag for sorting.

History: i’ve privately maintained this XLS since the Nats moved to Washington and update it every time a new list is released. Periodically I’ll update/upload it to google for announcement.

Note: i’ver never paid for BaseballProspectus, so i’m missing most of their lists over the years. I do pay for the Athletic, BaseballAmerica, D1baseball.com, and ESPN+ so all of those are there.

I’ve taken to highlighting in yellow the “outlier” rankings per player as I ingest them, which helps when i do the writeups/reviews of prospect rankings in this space. So if you see a rank that’s highlighted in yellow it probably is an outlier as compared to the rest of the ranking for that player in that year.

Lastly, my personal rankings are in Green.


Opening Day Starters

Direct link: Opening Day Starters or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mv8gLgJOuJHEAf_pXNwPWGCNRL4RnYEyulH6rxMuudA/edit?usp=sharing

What is it?: just a list of the opening day starters for every team, dating back to 2000. I have always had a fascination with these guys, and there’s a bunch of trivia questions in there. Baseball-Reference now has the same data at their site per team, which is really cool.

I usually do a post the day after opening day and will update it then.



Other random artifacts not always online: As alluded to above, I maintain a few other random spreadsheets and documents, mostly locally, but do periodically upload copies of them. But, if anyone is interested in these things I could throw them onto Google.

  • Nationals 40-man Roster tracking document: maintained in a Text file locally. This is mostly useful to me because I keep track of major transactions here, and it’s a useful way for me to quickly grab acquisition dates for stuff.
  • Top 100 prospect tracking: this used to be more comprehensive, but how basically just a collection of pundit top 100 prospect lists for the Minors with Nats guys highlighted. Maintained in a Text file locally. I update this every time someone publishes a “Top 100 prospects in the minors” link.
  • Nats Minor League Rotations (now just season beginning and ending): maintained in a Text file locally. Only really updated a few times a year; opening day and closing day.
  • Nats Trading Partners: Maintained in a text file locally, updated whenever we make a trade. Fun fact: this team has not made a SINGLE TRADE with Baltimore since 2001. We havn’t traded with Houston since 2007, Colorado since 2009. It’s crazy how we trade with some teams constantly but others almost never.
  • Nats Catcher Depth Chart: Maintained in a text file locally, updated several times a year when we have Catcher movement/transactions.
  • Nats Attendance and Home Opener stats: Maintained in a text file locally, used to do an annual post on the same topic.
  • Nats Payroll worksheet: abandoned recently, Cots does a better job.
  • Nats Options worksheet: abandonded recently, Roster Resource does a better job.

Plus for all of baseball i’ve got stuff like:

  • MLB Franchise Financial Overview: this is an XLS I put together from some other sources I maintain to put all the core financial details of each MLB franchise in one place: It has the RSN revenue amounts and ranks, each team’s MSA rank and DMA rank for comparison, their Forbes valuation and 2023’s payroll to see who’s skimping and who is spending. It’s a subset of data on the Sports/Winner/City xls below but updated to 2023 figures.
  • Sports/Winner/City: a huge spreadsheet that tracks all four major sports in the USA to track franchise movement, champions, most recent year each city won a title, who held multiple sports titles at once, etc.
  • Manager roster: used to answer the question, “What percentage of managers were Catchers?” Answer, its not as many as you think. I updated it recently to support a Quora answer I was crafting.
  • GM Rankings and Roster: difficult to keep updated, especially “ranking” GM/front offices, but its current to the latest moves.
  • Player Demographics: annually updated when the opening day rosters are announced. When I get 2025’s figures i’ll do a quick post and throw it into Google Sheets.
  • MLB Team Payroll worksheets: annually updated, then finds its way to other XLS here.
  • Hall of Fame Roster: I manually maintain a HoF roster to be able to quickly filter by position.
  • Sports Revenues Annually across major sports; updated when we get more macro level revenue figures for the sport.
  • Realignment Scenario Worksheet: I did a post on this
  • Verducci Effect worksheet: abandoned. In the macro his theory was disproven, though his point was not to apply his theory to every pitcher, just certain starters.
  • Ball in Play Studies Worksheet: subject of a great 2012 post I did about the amount of time the ball is in play for major sports, probably needs updating.
  • Opener Worksheet: a worksheet that attempts to show how a team could use a staff entirely made of relievers, to see if it could work. Short Answer: i don’t think it can work.
  • MLB Team Playoff History: made up to show just how much parity there is in MLB. 66% of the teams in the league have made the playoffs in the last three years and every team in the league has made the playoffs in the last 8, as example stats.

If I was more diligent i’d have all these artifacts in the cloud instead of locally, so everyone could see. If anyone wants to see some of these artifacts I can always upload them somewhere.


Anyway, hope you enjoy the main links above, which was the reason I posted this in the first place.

Written by Todd Boss

March 20th, 2025 at 11:14 am

Todd Boss Top 104 Prospects for the Nats system

26 comments

This will be the last time we use Crews’ image on a prospect list. Next up hopefully we’re talkinga bout ROY. Photo via Crews’ Instagram page.

You read that headline correctly. Believe it or not, I have more than 100 names on my list for this system, and its time to reveal them.

There’s only about 165 players even allowed to be on minor league domestic rosters, then add in another 30-35 players in the DSL, so naming 100 players is a sizeable chunk of all the players on our minor league payroll. However, I got to 100 players by virtue of including basically every prospect in our system who has EVER appeared on a single other pundit’s ranking, to go along with a few pet prospects of my own from recent drafts and IFA classes.

Yes, it is a fool’s errand to rank higher than 40. Anything above 50-60 is patently ridiculous. Naming a player the 95th prospect in a system of 165 is crazy. But, here we are.

By the way, if you want to see my master Prospect rankings with this and every other prospect shop all in one place, here it is. There’s now 260 collected rankings of our prospects dating to Dec 2005.

I’ll chunk these up into groupings of 10 for readability, and since honestly above the 50-60 range there’s not a whole lot between the guy ranked 50th and 90th. Note: I did this ranking and writeup before the two Spring Breakout games (Nats/Astros box and Nats/Mets box) which were a useful tool to do prospect evaluation since it’s quite telling who the team chose to bring and play versus who they did not. I’ll sprinkle in comments throughout and how I would have adjusted some of these ranks with this late-breaking news.


My prospect ranking guidelines, which you’ll see here:

  • I like floor versus ceiling. I’ll have a guy like, say, Andrew Alvarez ranked higher than some 17yr old in the DSL with a huge bonus because, well, Alvarez is in AAA right now while that 17yr old may have a $3M bonus but we’re talking 5 years and a thousand things that could go wrong with the guy before he’s at the same place Alvarez is right now.
  • I don’t think relievers are worthy of being top-30 prospects. I think its ridiculous to have someone like Brzycky ranked in the 20s when his ceiling seems to be half a war as the 5th guy out of the MLB bullpen, while the team could convert Rutledge to a closer tomorrow and probably get more value. (Edit: we’ve now learned that, finally, Rutledge IS going to the bullpen, so this throw-away comment now seems prophetic).
  • Same thing to a lesser extent with guys who have a ceiling of backup middle-infielder, 1B/DH/Bench bat, or 2nd catcher. They’re just not going to be in my top 30, but as we’ll see my 31-40 is littered with them. It’s not that they’re not important … its just that (like relievers) they’re failed starters who are the definition of replacement players.
  • 2024 draft picks and 2025 IFA signings have yet to play for the most part, so I tend to rank them lower than star-glazed prospect watchers elsewhere.
  • If someone is in the DSL … I struggle to give them a ranking inside the top 30 unless they cleaned up there. I really want to see players with domestic stats before really considering them for the top 30.

Here we go.

1 Dylan Crews OF (CF)
2 Travis Sykora RHP (Starter)
3 Brady House SS/3B
4 Jarlin Susana RHP (Starter)
5 Seaver King SS
6 Yohandy Morales 3B
7 Cayden Wallace 3B
8 Cade Cavalli RHP (Starter)
9 Alex Clemmey LHP (Starter)
10 Robert Hassell III OF (CF)

1-10 comments:

  • Nothing shocking about 1-5, except maybe the order of 2-3-4.
  • I’m not ready to drop House below Susana. A reminder: if House had gone to college, he’d be a 21-yr old with zero pro stats, not in MLB camp. Also, at the Spring Breakout game Susana looked god-awful (yanked in the 1st on pitch count, 5 walks, just 1 K, lit up by the Astros hitters. SSS but telling of the issues he had early on).
  • I have kept Morales at #6, preferring to believe he’s still that high and doesn’t deserve to get dropped a dozen slots like most other pundits who layered him while also admitting he had a frigging hand injury mid 2024. However: Three whiffs in the breakout game; not impressive.
  • I’m higher on Wallace than many, and I think the team is going to have some serious issues finding PT for both him and Wallace this season (presuming Wallace gets bumped to AAA). However, if the Breakout game is any indicator, we know the plan: Wallace played 2B. He’s shorter and stockier than House and handled the position well enough. He hit 3rd, right behind House, something we may see in AAA soon enough.
  • I may be too high on Cavalli, but I also havn’t forgotten that in mid 2022 he was our #1 prospect and one of the best arms in the minors. Yes, I am concerned he’s taken 18 months to get back. Maybe he should be lower. 2025 is the year he either blows up in the majors or becomes the next Cole Henry.
  • I’m not quite as high on Clemmey; like him, want to see him do more above low-A. He did get the start in the second breakout game and looked solid.
  • Hassell stays in my top #10: I had him slightly lower before his great spring. I wonder if the Nats take a look at Wood/Young/Crews mid-season and look to package Hassell and another blocked player like a Wallace or Made for a major starting pitcher, because I’m finding it harder and harder to think those two will ever get reps for this team. Notably, Hassell was not at the Breakout game, probably b/c he’s making such an impression in MLB camp.

11 Caleb Lomavita C
12 Luke Dickerson SS/CF
13 Andry Lara RHP (Starter)
14 Tyler Stuart RHP (Starter)
15 Daylen Lile OF (CF)
16 Kevin Bazzell C/3B
17 Jake Bennett LHP (Starter)
18 Brad Lord RHP (Starter)
19 Angel Feliz 3B/SS
20 Andrew Pinckney OF (Corner)

11-20 Comments:

  • I’m a little lower on Dickerson than others. That’s because I want to see prep kids hit with wood before naming them the next coming of Mike Trout. He got an AB and a whiff in the Breakout game, going against a polished AAA reliever with stuff. Would love to see him make the Low-A team out of spring, but something tells me its XST until June.
  • I’m probably a bit higher on both Lara and Stuart than others; Floor impresses me more than ceiling, though Lara’s splits (as pointed out by Law) are shocking.
  • Lile at 15: we’ve talked about him a lot. TL/DR: I think he’s an undersized 4th outfielder completely blocked by better prospects in our system who will never play for us and should get traded to a team that might give him a chance. I will say this: he looked really solid at the Breakout game, leading off, looking like a real pro at the plate.
  • I have Lord higher than anyone; his 2024 season impressed the hell out of me, and It wouldn’t surprise me in the least if he gets added to the 40-man and called up in 2025. If that’s not a top-20 prospect, then I dunno what is. He was on the breakout roster but didn’t throw, as they had really odd pitching choices (choosing to throw Alvarez and Shuman 3-innings each instead of distributing the workload and giving guys like Lord and others more PT).
  • Pinckney at 20: I’m not sure I see it, but others do; the team has invited him to spring training two years in a row now. He’s a lanky CF-capable guy who didn’t exactly light it up in AA or AAA last year, and when i’ve seen him I see a tall guy with a slow, loopy bat. He’s got the same problem as Lile: better guys already playing in the majors. On our depth chart, he’s behind our three young MLB starters, behind Hassell, behind Call, probably behind the recently outrighted Garrett, and if it came to it you’d have to think he’s behind Lile as well. Not sure what the future is here. I should probably have him in the mid 25s, but I wanted to keep him ahead of the three outfielders at the top of the next section for obvious reasons. All that said … he impressed in the Breakout game, played CF ahead of a slew of our OF prospects and whacked a homer. So I dunno.
  • Bazzell caught the back part of the first spring breakout game … and he looks like a Catcher. I know he was listed as a C/3B, but he’s gonna be behind the dish. Is it notable that Keith Law actually ranked him HIGHER than Lomavita in his list? We’ll soon see: I suspect they’ll be trading off days in Low-A to start the season.

21 Cristian Vaquero OF (CF)
22 Victor Hurtado OF
23 Elijah Green OF (CF)
24 Rafael Ramirez Jr. SS
25 Kevin Made SS
26 Jackson Kent LHP (Starter)
27 Armando Cruz SS
28 Andrew Alvarez LHP (Starter)
29 Brayan Cortesia SS
30 Andres Chaparro 1B/DH

21-30 comments:

  • We should call this the “Wasted Bonus Money” portion of the rankings. Vaquerio (4.9M), Hurtado ($2.8M), Green ($6.5M) and Cruz ($3.9M) comprise basically the entirety of three IFA draft classes and our 6th overall pick two years ago, and none of them have really done anything except fall in these rankings and scuffle in the low minors. These guys all were “worth” this money at one point, at least according to our talent evaluators, and I suppose all of them can turn the corner and rebound, hence being in the 21-30 range.
  • That said, Green looked awfully good in the Breakout game: laced a double, crushed a homer to Left center. Of course true to his form, four of his five ABs were three-true-outcomes: he also had a walk and two whiffs. The team has not given up on this guy, as evidenced by his start in this game, and he’s not gonna get cut with his much bonus money in him. Lets hope he makes some adjustments.
  • Chaparro has exhausted his rookie eligibility by service time but not ABs (kinda like Nunez), so I ranked him at the edge of the top 30. He destroyed AAA pitching last year and probably is the leading bench bat in the majors. So what if he has no position? He seems like he can hit. He’ll quickly graduate and it won’t matter, but a guy who’s going to make the MLB roster with rookie eligibility really should be ranked somewhat highly. Maybe I should treat him with the same thought process of middle relievers and backup infielders, since he’s 1B/DH limited. In a couple weeks it won’t matter anyway.
  • I consider both Ramirez Jr. and Made the same guy: all glove-no hit SS prospects who some guys love, but I wish they hit better than .220 (Made) or .183 (Ramirez). For now, they project at short, but they may plummet down the prospect list if they continue to not hit. Notably, neither was at the Prospects game as King started both games.
  • Alvarez at #28; I have him by far higher than anyone else. Getting to AAA matters. And the Nats agree with me, giving him 3 innings at the Breakout game where he looked pretty solid honestly. He had cleaner mechanics than I remember, reminding me of Mike Hampton; upright, 3/4 delivery, simple motion.
  • $1.9M buys you a top-30 spot if you are Cortesia. I hate ranking 16yr old IFA signings like this but he’s pretty highly regarded. Hopefully he’s not in the 50s at this time next year (see further down for failed IFA signings)

31 Darren Baker 2B
32 Zach Brzykcy RHP (Reliever)
33 Evan Reifert RHP (Reliever)
34 Jackson Rutledge RHP (now a Reliver)
35 Daniel Hernandez C
36 Drew Millas C
37 Sammy Peterson OF (CF)
38 Orlando Ribalta RHP (Reliever)
39 Marquis Grissom RHP (Reliever)
40 Cole Henry RHP (Reliever)

31-40 comments:

  • Here’s where I’m dumping all the relievers that others may have in the 20s. Brzycky, Reifert, Ribalta, and Grissom primarily, plus now Rutledge.
  • If I down-grade relievers, I probably should down grade middle-infielder backup ceiling players like Baker, and backup catchers like Millas, hence their placement in this range.
  • Reifert (our rule-5 pickup) may not be long for the team with his awful spring training, and with the rise of the likes of Ribalta and Henry this spring it makes no sense to saddle the bullpen with an arm who can’t get anyone out. But, he belongs in this area.
  • Speaking of Henry; he was 10 slots lower on my board before it became known he was moving to the bullpen this spring and started getting guys out. He’s already been optioned to AAA, which is fine, and I hope to see him pitching the 8th or 9th for Rochester to start the season.
  • Speaking of guys who should have converted to relief … Rutledge comes in at #34 because, frankly, I think he needs to move to the bullpen. And, it may happen soon; Yeah, I wrote that before Zuckerman reported that he’s going to the Pen.
  • AAA rotation, now that Rutledge and Henry are out of the picture, is still looking stuffed. The glut of starters at the MLB level likely sends both Herz and Ogasawara to AAA, along with Cavalli. You already have guys that were in the AAA rotation like Lord, Stuart, and Alvarez who shouldn’t make way. You also have newly added 40-man Lara, who should be in AAA but probably starts in AA. AND you have a couple of new acquisitions that probably should be in that rotation too (Plinkington and Choi). That’s way, way too many starters and something is going to give. I’m guessing Choi goes back to AA (he was a minor league rule-5 pick and was in AA last year). So, best guess on AAA rotation: Herz, Ogasawara, Cavalli, Lord, Alvarez, with Stuart, Lara, Choi back to AA and Plinkington in long-relief/utility man area.
  • Grissom was an interesting look at the prospects game: works fast, his best pitch is a changeup, and he pitched a clean inning. But, did he look like a guy who could succeed in a MLB pen? I don’t think so.
  • We do have a couple of guys in this section who might push forward soon: Hernandez was one of our big-money 2025 IFA signings and I only put him this high b/c BA loves him. Peterson may have been an 8th rounder, but MLBPipeline has him as our #30 prospect. So, I stuck both in this section to acknowledge that the pros like them and we’ll see how they play this year.

41 Robert Cranz RHP (Reliever->Starter?)
42 Randal Diaz SS/3B
43 Jose Feliz RHP (Starter)
44 Dashyll Tejeda OF (CF)
45 Brayan Romero RHP (Starter)
46 Phillips Glasser SS
47 Tyler Schoff RHP (Reliever)
48 Carlos Tavares OF
49 Manuel Cabrera SS
50 Jose Atencio RHP (Starter)

41-50 comments:

  • I’ll be honest: the sole reason I have Cranz and Diaz here was because Keith Law put both of the 2024 draftees in his top 20. Cranz was a 7th rounder reliever in college who apparently has four pitches and will be a starter this year. BA also put him in at #24 for the system, so Law isn’t crazy here. It was telling that Diaz was at the Prospects games though, and he may be trending higher.
  • This range seems to be the “halfway promising DSL player” section. That includes Feliz, Tejeda, Tavares, and Cabrera.
  • Feliz was the best DSL starter last year and Tejeda was the best hitter (either him or Angel Felix, ranked #19). After such an awful crop of 2023 players, i’m hopeful these two will move stateside soon.
  • Romero is only here b/c BA put him as #30. I lampooned that pick in my review of their top 30 list; maybe I’m wrong.
  • I like Atencio, and probably should have him a bit higher after his 2024. He graduated from Low-A then threw 19 High-A starts at a 3.41 clip. He’s not higher b/c he’s not a big K/9 guy.
  • Glasser may be completely undeserving of a mid 40s spot, but he did start the second breakout game and went 2-2 with a walk.

51 Nick Peoples OF
52 Hyun-Il Choi RHP (Starter)
53 Chase Solesky RHP (Starter)
54 Kyle Luckham RHP (Starter)
55 Angel Roman LHP (Starter)
56 Jack Sinclair RHP (Reliever)
57 Everett Cooper SS
58 T.J. White OF (Corner)
59 Elian Soto OF/SS
60 Marcus Brown SS/2B

51-60 comments:

  • This seems to be where I’m sticking “Starters who have had some success and who could still succeed for this team.” That includes Choi, Solesky, and Luckham, all of whom have gotten to the AA level and succeeded there. In fact, i thought Soleksy might actually get protected in Rule-5, having been sent to the AFL last fall.
  • Peoples, Cooper, White, and Brown all fall into the same category: they were all 2021-22 draft picks who were at one point fringe top 30 guys who have struggled as they’ve moved up the chain. TJ White was as high as #19 on a list last year and is completely off every major list this year. Interestingly, He was the DH/cleanup hitter in the second breakout game, meaning he’s still on the prospect radar.
  • Soto is, of course, younger brother of Juan. He’s nowhere close to where his brother was at this stage of his career of course: Juan debuted in the majors at 19 while Elian is hitting .175 in the FCL at 19. Is he a prospect? He’s sticking in this range on name alone.
  • Sinclair got an appearance at the Prospects game, bailing out Susana in the first. He has big time movement on his fastball, which had great arm-side ride despite not being that high in velocity. He seems like the kind of guy who can sit in a bullpen for a while getting outs.

61 Luke Young RHP (Starter)
62 Rony Bello INF
63 Yoel Tejada Jr.  RHP (Reliever)
64 Brenner Cox OF (CF)
65 Lucas Knowles LHP (Reliever)
66 Daison Acosta RHP (reliever)
67 Hector Liriano OF
68 Dustin Saenz LHP (Starter)
69 Sir Jamison Jones CA
70 Mark Davis RHP (Starter)

61-70 comments:

  • A lot of these guys are here b/c they were on the fringes of the Prospects1500 top 50 list, so I gave them some credit in the 60-70 range.
  • Bello is a 2025 IFA bonus ranking, something I hate to do but whatever, its #62.
  • I like Saenz and Knowles; they’ve both had really solid seasons for the team in the last couple of years. But, both may have also hit ceilings.
  • Sir Jamison Jones: he’s an interesting one; decent scouting report, still shocked he signed. Will he turn into Cox (who I have at #64 here) or will he stand out? He was a defensive C sub in the second breakout game.
  • Daison Acosta might very well make the MLB this year, with a live arm and a 2025 NRI. Maybe he should be higher, like in the 30-40 “decent relievers” section.
  • Tejada pitched the last two innings of the second breakout game, probably a telling appearance. He’s still on the XST roster.

71 Roismar Quintana 1B/OF
72 Seth Shuman RHP (Starter)
73 Jeremy De La Rosa OF (Corner)
74 Jermaine Maricuto 1B/C
75 Leuris Portorreal RHP (Starter)
76 Gavin Dugas 2B
77 Mikey Tepper RHP (Starter)
78 Michael Cuevas RHP (Starter)
79 Leodarlyn Colon RHP (Starter)
80 Brandon Pimentel 1B

71-80 range:

  • Several guys in this section who used to be far higher up the list; Quintana, Shuman, and De La Rosa.
  • I’ve always liked Shuman: he missed 2020 with Covid and 2023 with injury, now is 27 and put up decent stats in AA .. but he’s too old. I don’t entirely understand why the team didn’t promote him more aggressively last year. Then, he pops up in the Breakout game and threw the last three innings cleanly. So, maybe he should be higher.
  • Maricuto and Portorreal were basically the best of the 2023 IFA class and a couple of the few that graduated to Florida last year.
  • Pimentel: one shop randomly had him in their top 50 so I threw him in here.
  • I’ve always thought Dugas had the potential to be a real baller, despite being a senior sign.
  • Tepper is probably ranked here b/c he’s got local ties (he went to Liberty), but his numbers last year weren’t half bad.

81 Jared McKenzie OF (CF)
82 Joe Narango 1B
83 Jorgelys Mota SS
84 Miguel Gomez RHP (Reliever)
85 Liam Sullivan LHP (Starter)
86 Yoander Rivero SS
87 Bryan Sanchez RHP (Starter)
88 Viandel Pena SS
89 Andy Acevedo OF
90 Elijah Nunez OF (Corner)

81-90 commentary

  • A hodge podge of players here.
  • Narango was a MLFA who can still hit.
  • Acevedo was a big-bonus 2023 IFA who was ranked as high as #19 by Fangraphs two years ago (Longenhagen really likes Ceiling) but who havn’t done much.
  • Sullivan made two starts and hit the DL, missing the whole season in Low-A but I think he could be something as long as it wasn’t TJ that costs him all of 2025.

91 Matt Suggs C
92 Max Romero Jr. C
93 Pablo Aldonis LHP (Starter)
94 Todd Peterson RHP (Reliever)
95 Carlos Batista OF
96 Johnathan Thomas OF (CF)
97 Gabriel Agostini LHP (Reliever)
98 Branden Boissiere OF (Corner)
99 Juan Garcia SS
100 Juan Obispo OF
101 Nathan Ochoa Leyva OF (Corner)
102 Holden Powell RHP (Reliever)
103 Jackson Cluff SS
104 J.T. Arruda SS

91-104 commentary

  • This range gets players who had like a season of high-hopes, and now have had several seasons of lack of production that has put their ceiling as an org guy.
  • Boissiere is one of those 1B/corner OF who has never really hit but who sticks around. He was a 3rd rounder and got a bit of a bonus, which may explain it.
  • Holden Powell: case study why you shouldn’t draft guys who are already relievers in college.
  • Cluff, Arruda, Thomas: all guys who have worked their way up the org but who now are waiting out the 6year MLFA string. Thomas appeared in the second breakout game.
  • So, I may have Romero way too low here. He was the starting catcher at the first Breakout game, catching 6 innings while Bazzell got the last few. Maybe he’s a better prospect than I gave him credit for. I’ll probably move him into the 40-50 range just based on principle after this publishes.

Speaking of the first Breakout game, here’s the ranks for the starters, subs, and arms:

Game 1:

  • Lile: 15
  • House: 3
  • Wallace: 7
  • Morales: 6
  • Pinckney: 20
  • King: 5
  • Green: 23
  • Romero: 92
  • Cox: 66

Subs

  • Mota: 84
  • Cruz: 27
  • Tavares: 48
  • Peterson: 37
  • Dickerson: 12
  • Bazzell: 16

Arms

  • Susana: 4
  • Sinclair: 56
  • Grissom: 39
  • Alvarez: 28
  • Shuman: 72

Top 20 Prospects not in either Breakout game: Crews (1), Sykora (2), Cavalli (8), Hassell (10), Lara (13), Stuart (14), Bennett (17), Lord (18), Feliz (19).


Phew. 104 players. did I miss anyone? Did I accidentally list someone here that we released (I did that last year I think). I did a quick glance at our Draft boards and tried to find the highest drafted non-senior sign players from the last few draft classes not mentioned in the top 104:

  • 2024: 11th rounder Merritt Beeker; low-A middle reliever
  • 2023: 9th rounder Thomas Shultz, high-a closer and who pitched in the breakout game.
  • 2023: 12th rounder Travis Sthele: low-A starter
  • 2022: 7th rounder Riley Cornelio: this is a surprise b/c he’s been a rotation starter since he got here.
  • 2022: 8th rounder Chance Huff: middle reliever in High-A.
  • 2021: 14th rounder Erik Tolman, injured Low-A starter

I’m also completely missing Carlos Romero, who was in the 2nd breakout game and who is a reliever in AAA. I checked in my XLS and when he hit 6yr MLFA I turned him inactive. Clearly he’s been retained/resigned and so I’ll probably throw him in the 50s somewhere going forward.

Written by Todd Boss

March 17th, 2025 at 9:07 am

Posted in Prospects

One Month into College season check-in on top 1-1 candidates

38 comments

We introduced a new segment this year, based on our team having the 1st overall pick (which is abbreviated “1-1” meaning 1st round, 1st pick) of the 2025 draft. Since we’ll get our choice of players for the first time in a generation. I’m putting in periodic updates about the candidates to go 1st overall.

Here’s a one-month check-in on the top College candidates, who now have four weeks worth of competition, along with links for the top prep candidates in the mix.

In early March, Keith Law posted his first look at the top candidates and included a couple of new names at the top that we’ll add to the names we looked at in our first of this series two weeks ago.

Aggregation Stats for all of College

Link Block for the top guys under 1-1 consideration


Here’s some commentary:

  • LaViolette: One month in, and he’s still only hitting .235. His OBP is ok (.414) and his Slugging solid (.515). He had a great Friday night against New Mexico State last weekend, but took o-fers in mid-week games against UTSA and Texas-Southern, which is an abomination. Mid-week starters are like the 4th or 5th starters, and UTSA/Texas-Southern aren’t exactly SEC quality opponents. He’s playing his way, not only out of the 1-1 conversation, but maybe even out of the top 10.
  • Arnold: After two solid games to open the season, he gave up 2 runs in 5IP against the non-powerhouse Georgetown Hoyas on 2/28, then hasn’t pitched since. He was scratched against Lipscomb with “illness” for his 3/7 start. At least it wasn’t b/c of an arm issue. We’ll see how he bounces back as they open ACC play against Boston College next Friday. BC just hammered UVA, so they’ll be an interesting out.
  • Bremner: he bounced back after two middling starts to shut down Fresno State with 7ip, 3hits, 1run, but only 4Ks. He then gave up three runs to Cal State Northridge, not an impressive outing. He needs to show some 7ip, 3hit, 10k, 0BB outings and fast if he wants to be a top 10 draft pick.
  • Arquette got the Keith Law Treatment, whose TL/DR summary is this: “he’s too big to play SS, struggled when i saw him, but he’s probably the best college hitter right now.” Through 4 weeks of play, he’s sporting the healthy slash line of .400/.492/.640. And he’s doing it against what probably is the toughest early season schedule out there as Oregon State embarks on its non-affiliated life post PAC-12.
  • Canarella has decent if not sparkling stats so far. .288/.431/.462. Not a ton of power/XBH so far (just 1 HR). He was more well regarded last year and isn’t re-pushing upwards to regain his top spot so far.
  • Doyle is pushing his name upwards so far this year. Through 4 starts, he’s got “oversized little leaguer” stats right now. 20.1 IP, 6 hits, 1 run given up for a 0.44 ERA. But he’s got a 47/5 K/BB ratio in those 20.1 IP, which means that of the 61 batters he’s retired thus far, 47 have been by whiff. Wow. His 4 opponents: Hofstra, Samford, Oklahoma State, and St. Bonaventure. Ok so not the greatest competition, but against OK State he still had 9Ks in 4 1/3rd IP.
  • Kilen has popped up on radars b/c of silly stats he’s putting up in Tennessee’s early season. He’s got an obscene slash line right now of .463/.589/1.093 slugging for an OPS figure north of 1.600. And he’s not even the biggest OPS figure on his team. He’s got 8 homers in 16 games to go with a ton of other XBHs. Is he a top prospect? He’s an undersized 2B with a hot start; we’ll see if he can keep things going.
  • Holliday has nothing new that I can find; its March so his HS season probably hasn’t started yet, but his HS stats would be useless anyway.
  • Hernandez; same as Holliday. All we can hope for is a scouting trip like what Law posted for Cunning ham.
  • Cunningham had a snippet in Law’s latest scouting notebook. TL/DR: “he’s probably not even 5’9″, has almost no power but has a great bat, and is more like a mid-1st rounder.” We may not bother covering him much further given who else is here and since we’re only projecting the best possible 1-1 candidate. A 5’8″ prep SS isn’t going 1-1.

Quick Tangent: did you see that George Mason scored TWENTY-THREE runs in the 2nd inning of their mid-week game against Holy Cross? 23 runs. Here’s the box score. The sequence of events is actually pretty hilarious. The inning included:

  • Eight (8) walks
  • Five (5) HBP
  • Five (5) infield hits, bunts, or fielders choices
  • Eight (8) hits that left the infield, several of which were bases-clearing doubles.

Someone on GMU also, in a move that probably had their coach screaming, STOLE THIRD BASE while up 13 in the inning. I’m surprised there weren’t more than 5 HBP.

Last funny item from the box score: Attendance: 25. Those Patriot fans really come out to support the team!


So, who’s in the lead to go 1-1? I’m liking what i’m seeing out of Doyle. Arquette maintaining his production. Want to see what happens with Arnold. Maybe Holliday is getting back in the mix just by virtue of the likes of LaViolette and Bremner falling.

Written by Todd Boss

March 10th, 2025 at 11:54 am

Posted in Draft,Prospects

MLB Pipeline Top 30 Nats Prospects Review

7 comments

The Real Robert Hassell III. Photo via his Twitter account.

The second to last of the major pundits dropped their Nats top 30 today on 3/4/25; here’s a review of the list as I’ve been doing with other major pundits.

The final one outstanding is Fangraphs/Eric Longenhagen, who didn’t release until May last year and is only about a third of the way done with the teams as we speak. I’m not going to wait for his ranking to release my rankings, which are going 90+ deep right now for our system.

For now, here’s the MLBPipeline list. I think its safe to say this is the sanest list I’ve seen yet, with very little wildcards or shock names. It very much aligns with my personal list, as we’ll discuss.

Here’s the top 30 in table format:

Here’s some thoughts.

  • Same top 4 as everyone else.
  • Really, the same top 5 as everyone else.
  • House down below the two arms; no surprise.
  • Clemmey at #6, like a lot of the shops. I like him a little lower b/c he’s so young, but he’s a high ceiling guy for sure.
  • They’re by far the highest on Dickerson, and have not wavered on him being this high since their December update. I’ve got him at #12, have seen him as low as #17. I’m hesitant to have a guy top 10 who hasn’t faced a pro pitch yet, but they arent.
  • They’ve got Lile at #10, which is in line with most other shops. I’ve beaten the Lile horse to death at this point.
  • Morales: dumped down to #13. They had him at #9 in December, and he was at #5 a year ago. Ok I get that Morales clearly was layered by breakout performances (Sykora and Susana) and 2024 draft picks (King, Dickerson, Lomavita) but he should have kept pace. We’ve had this conversation at length, no need to rehash it.
  • I think they’re a little low on Lara at #17, but not egregiously so.
  • Cortesia at #20: that’s aspriational for a 16yr old DSL kid, but he did get 1st round money ($1.9M) so we’ll see how his 2025 goes.
  • They’re by far the high man on Jackson Kent at #21.
  • They really, really like Grissom Jr and have him 20 spots higher than I do. Nobody else has him in their top 30; he’s at #24 here. This is probably the biggest issue I have with their top 30.
  • They’re also high-man on Sam Peterson, having him at #30 despite him not getting assigned out of XST last summer.

Who they’re missing:

  • Chaparro apparently doesn’t rate anybody’s prospect lists. Why? He’s still a rookie, he destroyed AAA pitching last year (albeit lots in the PCL), and made the majors at age 25. Come on; you’re ranking middle RHP relievers in AA but not a guy who got 30 games in the majors last year? What are we doing?
  • The same story to a lesser extent for Baker: not ranked.
  • No love for Cruz and his $3.9M bonus
  • No Rutledge (who BA has at #20), finally acknowledging that he may be out of chances to contribute.

All in all, a solid list, very much in line with my rankings as they’ve now settled, and hard to criticize a ton.

Written by Todd Boss

March 6th, 2025 at 11:06 am

Posted in Prospects

Our long MASN Nightmare is finally over

13 comments

It figures that one of the biggest pieces of franchise news hits at the exact moment I get into my car for a day and a half long business trip (I was in Tysons yesterday meeting with a client, then playing some pickleball at the new club off of Tyco road). So, apologies for being a little late to this.

Amazingly, in a news announcement that came out of complete left field, The Washington & Baltimore franchises have agreed to part ways after the 2025 season and end their MASN marriage.

Some salient details from the various announcements I’ve seen and some commentary:

  • The teams have ripped up their 2022-2026 agreement, which was (of course) in dispute anyway, and have agreed on a one year 2025 MASN deal worth an undisclosed amount, but if they honor the terms of the agreement for 2024 it should be around $58.3M.
  • There’s been so many hearings and appeals and what not that it’s not entirely clear what the Baltimore Franchise actually still owes the Nats: They only settled the 2012-2016 amount ($296M) in June of 2023. The implication is that the teams are still thus fighting about the amounts due for 2017-2021 and 2022-26, each of which is separately about a $300M payment.
  • It’s important to know just how combative and argumentative Baltimore has been throughout this entire process. They were never supposed to go to court to dispute the agreement; they sued anyway. Then they whined about the law firm MLB used. Then they whined about the team reps involved. Then, after the law firm was replaced and three new team reps were included … the group came to the same conclusion, and Baltimore appealed again, refusing to pay. It took another four years before the team finally, begrudingly was forced to pay.
  • While I find it tough to be sympathetic to multi-billionaire owners who clearly are not losing money on this team (why could they afford a $200M payroll 4 years ago but a third of that now?), the fact that they’ve had to fight over these figures for a decade is patently ridiculous, and MLB should have stepped in LONG, LONG ago.
  • Selig should have forced this to completion more than a decade ago, but i think he was afraid of Angelos and his tendency to sue. He was right.
  • I honestly thought MLB would force the divesture of this MASN partnership when the Baltimore team sold … and honestly i’m shocked this popped up now. What’s changed?
  • This was a ridiculously one-sided deal from the get go, and never should have been agreed to. MLB certainly has learned its lesson with these bullsh*t territorial rights agreements, and with promised expansion coming I’ll bet you a dollar they’re already working on freeing areas like Charlotte (from Atlanta) and Portland (from Seattle) to avoid this nonsense in the future.
  • Even in 2005, when this deal was struck, Anyone with a brain and a car KNEW there was not a real territorial control from Baltimore over the DC suburbs. Imagine today if I told you that you needed to be in Baltimore for a 7:05pm start time on a Tuesday, and you lived in, i dunno, Centreville. What time would you leave to avoid traffic to get to Baltimore on time? Noon? I mean seriously. If you left Centreville at 4pm, headed east on 66, around the beltway, then up 95 … you wouldn’t get there in three hours. You’d be better served taking a flight out of IAD to BWI and renting a car. So, Baltimore had no real fan base coming from huge swaths of the DC area for its games, and became a weekend touristy visit. Nobody’s buying season tickets to that team who lives in Virginia. So, I struggled with this from the get go.
  • The cancellation of this deal now has basically robbed the Nationals of the golden years of RSN money. Again, hard to be completely sympathetic to the billionaire Lerners, but for years they’ve gotten nothing but legal bills while comparable markets got massive amounts of money to help run their franchise. The DC area is ranked amongst the top 10 markets in the US for all major factors (6th in MSA, 6th in DMA) and generally compares with the following markets from a size/wealth perspective: Philly, Dallas, and Houston. You want to know what those three teams get from their RSN deals? Philly=$125M. Texas Rangers = $110M. Houston = $73-$80M). DC has had to fight just to get around $60M a year. That’s real money, and has real impacts on a team.
  • Now, of course, we’re seeing the collapse of RSNs, with half the teams around the league basically without a deal at all. I have to suspect this is what’s leading to the collapse of this deal altogether; Baltimore probably is looking at its RSN revenues and going white with shock, since its driven by a sh*tty Baltimore market and the complete underutilization of the Washington market (have you seen the MASN production values for Nats games? Its like Wayne’s World-quality sets and production value). And, of course, we’re in a new wave of streaming and cord cutting and the overall decline of conventional viewing patterns. Something likely gave, and even at a $50M clip the Baltimore owners probably balked and chose to walk away rather than continue to fight.
  • Remind me again … how the hell is Baltimore considered a “small market team” and given comp draft picks year after year … when we are legally obligated to get the exact same amount of TV revenue as they are, yet DC is considered a major market??
  • WP’s Barry Svrluga posted a scathing article basically calling out Lerner for the loss of “cover” for this deal going south, and he’s not wrong. This franchise no longer has any ‘excuses’ for not spending. Frankly, the last couple of years have been ridiculous, and they should have been more active to supplement the team. He also notes the patently ridiculous point that this team has yet to sell naming rights for the stadium (worth $20M a year usually) or jersey patches (worth $15M/year for some teams). Why?? We’re the ONLY DAMN TEAM in the league without either deal right now. Can you spell incompetent?
  • This handcuff of a deal had to be a massive displeaser for potential buyers of this franchise, so bravo to Lerner’s for getting out of it. I’ll bet this increased their franchise value by hundreds of millions of dollars overnight.
  • Speaking of selling, One has to think that this breakup was toasted with champagne by Ted Leonsis and his Monument network. I’ll bet Leonsis’ first call was to Lerner to basically say …. “so, you still interested in selling??” If the Lerner’s want out (and one has to think they do), then Leonsis is the way to go. He’ll immediately add to his two other pro franchises, immediately take the broadcasting in-house and get the “inventory” of an entire season of games for his network, and be able to do bundled/combo packages of Nats/Caps/Wizards players all cross-promoting. I mean, it makes too much sense not to happen right? Oh, and it’ll take Leonsis about 15 minutes to finally put a professional broadcasting studio together to do proper pre-game/post-game for the Nats, something that they’ve … never had.

Anyway, so that’s some stream of consciousness for today. Bravo for this happening, sorry it didn’t happen a decade ago when it should have, and no more excuses not to spend money.

Written by Todd Boss

March 4th, 2025 at 12:28 pm

Posted in Nats in General

Two weeks into College season check-in on top 1-1 candidates

18 comments

Jamie Arnold has a little Alex Wood look to him, a lefty slinger who comes in almost sidearm. Photo via FSU

Did you know we’re already two weeks into the D1 college season?

Let’s look at the first two weeks of the season for some of the top-ranked candidates to go 1-1, and draw some ridiculous and wildly speculative short-sample-size driven conclusions. 🙂

Actually, more seriously, I wanted to take a bit of time to do the first part of this post, which is to capture direct links for the players in question to have a quick resource I can refer back to. So, hope you enjoy this as well to save you some googling.

I’ll focus on probably just 5-6 players right now, maybe add more if players pop this spring. Obviously can’t do this for the HS guys in the mix like Holliday but if we can find something for them i’ll add it.

Link Block:


Two week check-ins:

  • LaViolette: starting slow; slashing .211/.444/.737 through two weekend series. Playing CF despite his size/projection to be a corner OF in the pros, batting 2nd. Only has four hits through 6 games but all four were XBH, pushing up his slugging and OPS. They’ve played Elon and Cal Poly on neutral fields, not exactly powerhouses, so a little disappointing of a start.
  • Arnold: FSU’s #1/Friday night starter: Can’t ask for a better start: 2 starts, 2 wins, 11IP and just 3 hits allowed. He went 6ip/1h against my alma mater JMU in the opener, then went 5ip/2h against Penn last weekend. Obviously Penn isn’t a baseball powerhouse but JMU can be frisky. In both games he was on a short pitch count and could have gone longer.
  • Bremner: UCSB’s #1/Friday starter: went 3 hitless innings to open against Campbell (rumor had it the weather was super cold), then 3 runs in 3IP against a weaker Seattle University team. Keith Law was on hand and wasn’t complementary of what he saw.
  • Arquette is on fire to start, playing SS and batting 2nd for OSU. Through two weekends he’s slashing .440/.559/.880 as OSU played in two top-notch tourneys to open their season. There’s definitely something to like about this guy.
  • Canarella has been playing CF and batting third for Clemson to start, but got subbed out of one game and missed another early in the season. He had labrum surgery (!!) in the off-season and there was some question if he’d be ready to go in Feb, and its also why some boards have him out of the top of the draft for now. So far, a slow start: .250/.333/.375 with almost no power. It’s also fair to say their opening weekend tournament was about as tough as it could be (they played OK State, Arizona, and Ole Miss). I wonder if he’s really even in the mix for the upper half of the first round.

Where do these players’ teams rank btw? Per D1baseball’s updated rankings post-weekend results,

  • TAMU #1 (holding at #1)
  • FSU #7 (up from #9)
  • UCSB #20 (up one from #21 pre weekend)
  • OSU #9 (down from #7 before weekend)
  • Clemson #13 (up 1 from #14 pre weekend)

So all these players are playing for top teams in solid divisions, which guarantees good competition when we get to conference play.

So, that’s a quick check in. Arnold and Arquette look great, LaViolette starting slow, Canarella may still be hurt, and Bremner seems like he may drop out of 1-1 contention unless he starts blowing away sub-par competition.

Written by Todd Boss

February 24th, 2025 at 9:33 am

Posted in Draft,Prospects