Well, now we can have the argument; was the Tanner Roark salary dump worth it? Because just a few days later the team signed his replacement; Anibal Sanchez last night to a deal to be his replacement. Contract details are a bit complicated by the reports i’ve seen: 2 guaranteed years, $19M of guaranteed money, with $6M deferred and a 2021 option worth $12M, and some unspecified details that could add $4M to the package.
From what I can tell, the luxury tax implications are just the guarantees; $19M over two years means $9.5M of a luxury tax hit this season … which is almost identical to the $9.8M we’d been using to project Roark.
So, is the team better off? Probably. Roark has had flashes of brilliance (2014 and 2016) … but his last two years he was losing velocity and had plateaued as a slightly below league average pitcher. Despite being much younger, we all kind of saw where he seems to be going, and the team clearly didn’t think his potential performance was worth the money.
Sanchez was a solid, familiar opponent in our division for years, always a solid competitor, an under the radar solid rotation piece. He was god-awful in the AL, then suddenly found a new pitch and a new approach upon returning to the NL and pitched like a #2 starter most of last season.
So the Nats are betting on his 35-year old resurgence continuing, and paying him for it.
Implications for the team:
40-man: this is the 40th guy on the 40 man; the next move requires us to cut loose someone.
Salary Cap: We’re basically treading water from where we were a week ago; i’ve got the team at $188.8M in luxury tax dollars for fy2019, versus a cap of $206M, still leaving $17.6M of room. I’ve seen other reports saying the Nats are now above $200M for the year and I don’t really see how people are arriving at that conclusion:
- $134M for 12 signed players for 2019
- $32.75M estimate for 6 arb eligible players
- $4.6M for the other 7 pre-arb players that will make up the rest of the 25-man roster
- $2.25M for the other 15 guys on the 40-man in the minors
- $14.5M for benefits
That totals $188.8M, leaving the $17.6M of room. I know some people want to use “real” dollars instead of lux tax dollars, but the difference really isn’t that much.
Rotation: obviously this bumps Erick Fedde to AAA, where he probably should be. This makes for a pretty solid rotation improvement over where we were yesterday. I’m not sure where this places the Nats rotation in the pantheon of the league right now; i have a worksheet that I’ll turn into a blog post that ranks them 1-30 once the remaining impact starters sign (Dallas Keuchel, Yusei Kikuchi, Wade Miley, Gio Gonzalez, Drew Pomeranz, Mike Fiers, etc). But I think there’s a clear top 5 of rotations in the league in some order: Chicago Cubs, Boston, Washington, Cleveland and the Dodgers. Right now i’ve got them roughly ranked in that order. This move bumped up the Nats a couple of slots by replacing a sub-#5 starter in Fedde with at least a #3 quality guy.
Verdict; I think they did pretty darn good considering what’s out there and what they have to work with. I’ll take Sanchez and his 2018 performance as my 4th starter any day. The question is … is it sustainable? Is it a one-off? Scouting reports seem to indicate he found a new pitch and worked it heavily, but that his numbers had some luck involved w/r/t BABIP and soft contact. He’s also 35, so we’re counting on an older guy to continue a sustained late-career surge. Kinda like what the Dodgers have done with Rich Hill, so it isn’t out of the realm of possible.