Nationals Arm Race

"… the reason you win or lose is darn near always the same – pitching.” — Earl Weaver

Nats announce underwhelming AFL 2026 Rosters

5 comments

Susana heading to the AFL for some more work. Photo Washington Post

The AFL rosters were announced today. The Nats are not well known for sending their best talent to Arizona, and this year seems no different. We’ve announced six (6) names as of this writing, which seems a little light, so I wouldn’t be surprised to hear a few more names added in (we sent 8 last year and most teams send 8-9).

Here’s who we’ve announced so far:

  • RHP Starter Jarlin Susana, AA
  • OF Teo Banks, High-A
  • LHP Reliever Noah Dean, AA
  • LHP Starter Nolan Hughes, Low-A
  • OF/3B Jorgelys Mota, High-A
  • RHP Starter RJ Sales, High-A

Post Publishing update 10/5/26: a look at the Salt River rosters shows a couple more players were added post initial announcement. The following guys are also on the AFL roster but are not discussed below:

  • RHP Reliever AJ Puk, Low-A
  • C Kevin Bazzell, AA

This is an … interesting group, to say the least. It includes two top 30 prospects at best (Susana and Mota), a couple of fringe at best arms (Sales and Hughes), an 18th round OF prospect who’s never been on anyone’s radar (Banks), and a frigging MLFA they signed in March who’s thrown a grand total of 14 innings for us (Dean).

Usually AFL players fall into one of several distinct categories:

  • Pitchers who were injured for most of the season and who need innings
  • Pending Rule-5 guys who they want one last look at.
  • Show-me pop up guys who the team wants to challenge in a less-meaningful environment
  • Top Prospects to show we’re actually playing by AFL roster rules.

So, how do these six classify w/r/t these rules?

  • Susana is clearly a top prospect, but also most nearly the entire season so he’s the classic “needs innings” case
  • Banks is … a pop-up guy? This is a 2024 18th rounder who had a .700 OPS figure this season.
  • Dean is another weird guy; he was a 2026 MLFA of all things, and then barely pitched. So, are we assuming the team signed him for multiple years? He was a 2022 draftee, so he’s technically Rule-5 eligible, but this is a weird one.
  • Hughes? Clearly the “needs more innings” guy, in that he’s got just 7 IP this season and is on the 60-day dl as we speak.
  • Mota could be considered a “show me” prospect, but he also only earned a promotion to High-A later in the season and he struggled badly up there; he’ll get destroyed by AA -level pitching in AFL.
  • Sales is classical “missed most of the season and needs innings” guy.

I wonder if the lack of star power in our AFL roster is mostly a function of the nature of our prospect depth right now, which is for the most part either nearly in the majors, injured, or is still a teen ager. To wit, here’s how the top 20 or so guys in the system would classify:

  • Already hit the Majors: Simpson, Kent, Perales, Ortiz
  • Already done AFL: King, Peterson, Petry, Wallace
  • Still hurt: Sykora, Rosario
  • Too young or too new: Willits, Fitz-Gerald, Hacopian, Cruz, Fein, Sime, Harmon, Brunson, James, Serrano

Also, thanks to aggressive promotions this season, we have almost no real Rule-5 candidates to consider. A quick guide down the Roster Resource lists a scant few R5 candidates to even talk about (burying the lead on the annual Rule 5 analysis, but here goes). I’m leaving out any 2026 MLFAs and/or 60-day DL guys.

  • in AAA right now: Romero, Wallace, Lawson, Powell
  • in AA right now: Young, Boissiere, Made, White, Luckham, Gaston, Huff
  • in High-A right now: Polanco, Stuart, Hill

Not a lot needing protecting this coming December, and certainly not a lot in the AA range that deserves a trip to Arizona. Boissiere? White? I dunno.

Possible candidates to consider adding if they need a few more bodies:

  • AAA starters like Cebert or Lyon: both over 100 IP this season though, and no real need to give them more.
  • AA starters like Clemmey, Tejeda, Randall, or Hartle: all have 120+ ip this year.
  • Catchers (they always need catchers): Romero, Bazzell, Lomavita; Bazzell in particular could use time behind the plate, and Romero is R5.

Players who I don’t know why they’re not in the AFL:

  • Swan: he’s the classical arm who needs more work, is AA talent.
  • Maybe Elijah Greene, just for humor purposes to see if he can strikeout 75% of the time?

So, that’s the AFL this year. I’ll be super curious when Susana throws, probably couldn’t care less about anyone else’s performance out there this year.


Post publishing data dump: I ran through the last few AFL rosters for comparison purposes. These names are in rough order of their “value” as prospects at the time:

  • 2026: Susana, Bazzell, Mota, Sales, Hughes, Dean, Banks, Puk
  • 2025: King, Bennett, Petry, Linan, Peterson, Aldonis, Amaral, Simpson
  • 2024: Wallace, Hassell, Cronin, Saenz, Cuevas, Romero, Young, Solesky
  • 2023: Hassell, Lipscomb, Herz, Pineda, Ward, Powell, Sinclair, Ribalta
  • 2022: Hassell, Millas, Cate, Antuna, Knowles, Willingham, Baker, Ribalta, Frizzell, Lindsly
  • 2021: Henry, Rutledge, Lee, Pineda, Millas, Peterson, Casey, Cluff
  • 2020: cancelled
  • 2019: Garcia, Sharp, Reetz, Raquet, Banks, Freeman, Lee, Condra-Bogan
  • 2018: Kieboom, Guilbeau, Braymer, Barrera, Noll, Mills, Johnson, Reyes
  • 2017: Robles, Williams, McGowin, Bacus, Cordero, Gushu, Gutierrez
  • 2016: Stevenson, Voth, Ward, Johansen, Brinley, Lee, Abreu

Written by Todd Boss

September 15th, 2026 at 5:13 pm

5 Responses to 'Nats announce underwhelming AFL 2026 Rosters'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Nats announce underwhelming AFL 2026 Rosters'.

  1. A commenter over on Nats Prospects noted that, if you look across the league, the Nats’ AFL roster doesn’t really look like an outlier. There’s only 12 top 100 prospects in the entire AFL. The Red Sox best prospect is their 26th best. The Astros don’t have ANYONE from their own top 30 going to the AFL this year. So there’s that.

    I don’t know whether teams are generally questioning the value of the AFL or that the CBA uncertainty is specifically undermining this year’s AFL delegations. All I’m saying is that any knee jerk “what are these idiots doing?” reaction may be missing something.

    John C.

    16 Sep 26 at 12:52 pm

  2. Harmon is actually a pretty good option. He falls into multiple categories: legit prospect, innings limited (41 IP), and I don’t think he’s obviously “too young/new” per se. He sure looked way too good for A pitching, and the AFL is generally a place for A+/AA players, so I don’t think he’d have been out of place. Also, having turned 20 recently, he’d definitely be one of the youngest arms there, but there’s always a handful of guys 20 or younger each season.

    Same story for Eli Willits. Yes, he’s 18, but Leo de Vries played in the AFL at age 17 (!) in 2024, alongside other future uberprospects, Colt Emerson and Ethan Salas, at age 18. So he too would be young, but not unprecedented.

    I’d have thought that Devin Fitz-Gerald would’ve been a really logical choice. At age 21 and with AA ball experience, he’s the exact kind of profile suited to the AFL. He could’ve gone a long way in washing off the stink of his middle two-thirds of the season, as he could’ve carried his strong finish to the season there. Bazzell too for the reasons you touched on.

    But it does seem that the Nats along with many other teams are handling the AFL very differently this season.

    I think if there weren’t an impending strike, and Toboni bucking conventional wisdom, the Nats could’ve fielded a really interesting contingent of: Willits, Fitz-Gerald, Bazzell, Susana, Harmon, Sales, Swan and Hughes. That would’ve been a lot of fun.

    Will

    16 Sep 26 at 4:41 pm

  3. I appended this to the post, but I went through my notes to grab the last 10 years of AFL rosters for comparison:

    – 2026: Susana, Mota, Sales, Hughes, Dean, Banks
    – 2025: King, Bennett, Petry, Linan, Peterson, Aldonis, Amaral, Simpson
    – 2024: Wallace, Hassell, Cronin, Saenz, Cuevas, Romero, Young, Solesky
    – 2023: Hassell, Lipscomb, Herz, Pineda, Ward, Powell, Sinclair, Ribalta
    – 2022: Hassell, Millas, Cate, Antuna, Knowles, Willingham, Baker, Ribalta, Frizzell, Lindsly
    – 2021: Henry, Rutledge, Lee, Pineda, Millas, Peterson, Casey, Cluff
    – 2020: cancelled
    – 2019: Garcia, Sharp, Reetz, Raquet, Banks, Freeman, Lee, Condra-Bogan
    – 2018: Kieboom, Guilbeau, Braymer, Barrera, Noll, Mills, Johnson, Reyes
    – 2017: Robles, Williams, McGowin, Bacus, Cordero, Gushu, Gutierrez
    – 2016: Stevenson, Voth, Ward, Johansen, Brinley, Lee, Abreu

    There’s some lean years in here for sure; many years its one prospect and a bunch of org guys.

    Todd Boss

    16 Sep 26 at 4:57 pm

  4. Jack Moroknek
    Nate Rombach
    Hunter Hines
    Eriq Swan
    Each of these guys could be thrown in the hat of possibles for the AFL.
    Swan needs more innings
    Moroknek and Hines fall under the category of show me, both played well in Fredericksburg but stunk it up in Wilmington, could play well in this years AFL.
    Rombach is a catcher, afl desperately needs catchers lol.
    Mota is a solid prospect for Nats not top 30 but noticeable, he should play well against in the afl this yr.

    Darry

    18 Sep 26 at 10:09 am

  5. I wonder if they’re leaving spots open in case they decide to send Herz and/or Early.

    And, given the way that these rosters are negotiated among multiple teams, I would completely believe that a team demanding multiple top priority SP slots would have to allow large portions of the rest of their roster to ride the pine.

    You could probably still send Hacopian or Bazzell or whoever but, without consistent playing time, wouldn’t you rather have them on the complex?

    SMS

    18 Sep 26 at 10:36 am

Leave a Reply